Rear Partin Tool

Topics include, Machine Tools & Tooling, Precision Measuring, Materials and their Properties, Electrical discussions related to machine tools, setups, fixtures and jigs and other general discussion related to amateur machining.

Moderators: GlennW, Harold_V

Post Reply
User avatar
tornitore45
Posts: 2078
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:24 am
Location: USA Texas, Austin

Rear Partin Tool

Post by tornitore45 »

I have a Chinese 9x20 lathe. The AXA100 parting tool holder has a built in 4 degrees positive rake. I guess the 4 degrees choice is a good compromise for most metals because it works fairly well.

A home made rear mounted holder would be much simpler if the built in rake was zero.

Presetting a built in rake requires the provision for height adjustment since depending on how far the tool protrude the tip height changes.

My question is: what kind of problems would result from setting the parting tool with zero rake.
Mauro Gaetano
in Austin TX
User avatar
BadDog
Posts: 5131
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post by BadDog »

Other than requiring you to grind rake (depending on material)? And of course, as soon as you start doing that, then sharpening will require adjustable height anyway (unless you grind off all the old rake. I've seen folks run them (well, pictures anyway) with no rake on the back, but no idea how well they do. I guess you could always get another AX post from Enco and mount it a bit high on the back. Then you could flip the post on the holder to mount it upside down. Problem solved AND you could run other tools back there if you chose to do so.
Russ
Master Floor Sweeper
Mike_Burdick
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 10:34 pm
Location: Utah

Post by Mike_Burdick »

tornitore45,

I use zero back rake on my parting tools all the time - no problem! Matter of fact, I'd rather have it that way so it won't "dig" in.
SteveM
Posts: 7767
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Post by SteveM »

The problem with that dang cutoff tool is that when you have a large item to part, you have to advance the blade as you go, so that you keep the overhang to a minimum. When you do that, the height changes.

I parted wheels advancing the tool 0.25" each time and had to re-adjust the height.

I now have an AXA parting tool with the blade horizontal (shop-made unit I got from a retired machinist) and now I do not need to adjust height.

A rear parting tool holder would be sinple to make. The one for my atlas is shown here:

Image

It's pretty much a tall block with a slot cut into it and screws to capture it. The bottom of the slot probably has a groove in it to locate the blade.


Steve[/img]
pockets
Posts: 807
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: Kimball, Michigan

Post by pockets »

I made a rear parting tool for my 9 x 20, with zero rake and would never go back. It works just fine.

Greg B.
When the man at the door said, "Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms," I naturally assumed it was a delivery.....

"From my cold, dead hand!" C. Heston
User avatar
tornitore45
Posts: 2078
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:24 am
Location: USA Texas, Austin

Post by tornitore45 »

Thank you guys, the consensur seems that zero rake works and make the tool post construction much simpler.
Off to the recycling center to dig up some suitable chunk of steel.
Mauro Gaetano
in Austin TX
spro
Posts: 8016
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: mid atlantic

level back-raked cutoff tool

Post by spro »

Winding a small chuck on right end of the grinder allows cheap little dremel or larger wheels to make that slight relief on parting tools etc.and not mess up main wheel edges.
Post Reply