|
Hi kvom,
Don't worry, the little Sherline spindle doesn't spin as fast as it should either and it works OK. What is probably more important is that your machine is solid with no possible movement. Solid carbide deflects less, but is definitely more brittle.
While the original Sherline mill was OK, especially when you consider what you get for your money, my rebuild is much stiffer with no possible movement on the X & Y axes, since they are both 1" dia. Thomson shafts on support rails with 5/8" dia. machine tool quality ball screws. The shafts and ball screws are both sealed. When I do the Z axis the same way, the machine will be even better.
I run the cutter as fast as the Sherline spindle can go and use a feed of .6"/min. which is slow, but works OK. For the cutter size, I know the spindle speed should be at least 15 thousand rpm., but slower speeds work as long as the feed rate is reduced proportionately. It takes 55 minutes to make one pass, but I find that watching the machine work is fascinating and anyway, I have to be there to vacuum out the chips so the cutter won't recut them and possibly break. There is no way in the world you could write that code manually! Theoretically, a faster rpm. would allow for faster feed rates, but I don't want to push the machine too far, mainly because of the cutters.
I'm not sure, but I think the solid carbide end mills can break from fatigue. I've had two break on me after running for a while, a 3/32" one on the Dart number plate several years ago and one of the .030" ones on this shield. They always break where the flutes join the shank (a stress concentrator). It is also possible that they may have been inadvertently subjected to greater stress than they could take, I don't know. An end mill with a shorter flute length would be better, but that's what I can get from KBC. KBC has them in .005" increments down to .010," with 4 flutes and end cutting.
Hope this helps.
Richard Trounce.
|