Rockmonton wrote:
well, the burner fit best that way....
That may be the case, but it's a good idea to follow the advice already dispensed by Big Dave. The flame should not impinge directly on the crucible, which will become evident to you when you fire the furnace.
This is a good case where looking for the lost wallet is best accomplished where it was lost, not where the light is best.
Quote:
I'm not 100% sure what you mean by a "Target wall"....
In this case it's a bit deceiving in that the flame doesn't impinge directly on the wall, but tangent to the wall. It creates a swirling motion to the flame, allowing it to circulate around the crucible, heating the wall and indirectly heating the crucible (uniformly) in the process. What you have built will work, but the back side will be slow to heat, while the area on which the flame impinges will over heat.
Quote:
that being said, getting a 4" x whatever length 1/4" plate rolled into a spiral to sit on the bottom of this shouldn't be all that difficult. not sure how long it would last, but hey, it's worth a try! Would that work as a target wall?
My personal opinion is that you should avoid using anything metallic. It will oxidize in the flame and begin shedding oxides. That could be avoided if you use the proper (expensive) alloy. Best thing you could have done was investigate the construction techniques utilized by those that build furnaces commercially, then emulate their design. That being said, because I'm not sure how much height you have, my comments,
below, may be a perfect solution, and you may have dodged a bullet.
Quote:
i'm trying to figure out now, what to do with the lid, especially as far as vent sizes go. is 3" enough?
I expect it will be adequate. You don't really want it too large, but it should be large enough to permit evacuation of the spent gasses, yet leave enough area to provide reflective heat to the charge. My guess would be somewhere between 3" and 4" is the ideal size. Unfortunately, I am not an engineer, so I build things like this by following my own advice of investigating that which has been done by others.
Quote:
i'm going to hang wire that's tacked to the lid through to hold the refractory in place, but i'm not sure anything past that.
You might consider splitting the form and installing a draw bolt, so you can tighten the steel band around the refractory if necessary. That is a common feature of those I build, and it has served me well. You might also consider welding short bits of steel to the inside of the form instead of wire, which has limited ability at the temperatures involved. The short bits will key the material, preventing movement.
You would have been ahead to have designed a pivot mechanism for the lid, so it didn't have to be removed. A simple mechanism allows it to lift and pivot to one side. Handling a red hot lid that weighs 40 pounds is going to be less than convenient, and likely in the way once removed from the furnace.
Quote:
I got about a 5% slope in the bottom of the foundry, and am goign to need to use some fire-brick to provide risers.
Common practice in melting furnaces is to provide a crucible block that is made of like material, so the crucible is heated from below as well. If you have enough clearance between the bottom of the furnace (by the way, it's a furnace, not a foundry) and the top,
you may be able to install a fire brick such that it deflects the incoming heat towards one side, allowing it to swirl around the chamber, and raising the crucible so the flame does not impinge directly on the walls. The fire brick(s) would serve as the crucible rest. I've always made mine from refractory materials and have enjoyed acceptable success. Just a thought.
Harold