Coolant

Topics include, Machine Tools & Tooling, Precision Measuring, Materials and their Properties, Electrical discussions related to machine tools, setups, fixtures and jigs and other general discussion related to amateur machining.

Moderators: GlennW, Harold_V

Mr Ron
Posts: 2126
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Vancleave, Mississippi

Coolant

Post by Mr Ron »

What is a good coolant for aluminum to be used in a mist coolant device?
Mr.Ron from South Mississippi
John Evans
Posts: 2366
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:33 pm
Location: Phoenix ,AZ

Re: Coolant

Post by John Evans »

As far as I'm concerned a mist system is more about lubercation rather than cooling. For real cooling you need a water based FLOOD cooling system. And if your machine is not totally enclosed a large mess is the resault ! WD-40 works well for aluminum BUT the waxy part of it makes for sticky chips that stick everywhere. For that reason I only use it when absolutey nescesary ,straight kerosene ,which is the other main thing in WD40 works well.
www.chaski.com
pete
Posts: 2518
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:04 am

Re: Coolant

Post by pete »

I'm certainly no expert, but I've read a major component of WD-40 is in fact kerosene just like John said. Apparently it goes through some type of chemical process to remove what they call aromatics that gives kerosene it's distinctive smell and additions are then made to make WD smell like it does. Overall a gallon of straight kerosene is a whole lot cheaper than a gallon of WD if your willing to tolerate the smell. Again like John said and some forum threads also have mentioned, there's no real difference between straight kerosene and WD as far as using it as a cutting fluid for aluminum. As long as you stay below it's instant smoke point for heat generated at the cutting tip, it lubricates the cutting edge, prevents chip welding and metal tearing as the cut progresses.That's what produces the much better surface finish.WD or kerosene is still a flammable, so using it in a mist coolant dispenser probably isn't a good idea since that's pretty much the same as what the injectors in a diesel engine do at a lot higher pressure. With a hot enough spark or ignition source you could end up with something you really don't want.

I'd also agree with John that these systems are more about lubrication than cooling, although there would certainly be at least some. Since I've never used one I have zero idea what would work the best. There are coolants specifically designed and meant to be used with them. I'd also read this, https://www.practicalmachinist.com/vb/c ... on-312545/ and it's only one of many about those mist coolant systems that might help. But an enclosed cnc is a whole lot different than a wide open manual machine. I fully trust Bill Shields judgement and experience and he had a bit to say on both pages of the thread here. http://www.chaski.org/homemachinist/vie ... 4&t=111303 So I'm not convinced they can be made to work well enough without an enclosure and even filtering or exhausting the residual air mist outside. It's not been mentioned on any YT video I've seen yet, but those using them on manual equipment seem to adjust down to very little coolant compared to the volume of air. I suspect that's to reduce any air borne mist to a minimum. Industry even has an acronym for that, MQL or Minimum Quantity Lubrication. If your not using it that much in a home shop it probably doesn't matter, but it's still worth knowing about. Because of the efficiency level, compressed air is still one of the most expensive forms of energy to produce and convert it into doing some type of work for you.
User avatar
Bill Shields
Posts: 10558
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
Location: 39.367, -75.765
Contact:

Re: Coolant

Post by Bill Shields »

Do not ever atomize anything combustible unless your specific intention is an explosion

Sparks do not have to occur at the cutting interface to cause problems.

Even with fully integrated halon systems, I have seen totally enclosed CNC machines blow their exhaust fans through the ceiling before the IR detectors can dump the halon into the cabinet.
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
RSG
Posts: 1546
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:59 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Coolant

Post by RSG »

Excellent advise guys! I recently bought a mist unit and was just going to run my regular coolant through it but with a higher water ratio. Still not sure t's worth it yet on points made like sticky chips, hard to clean up and mist in the air (inhalation).
Vision is not seeing things as they are, but as they will be.
Inspector
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:25 am
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Re: Coolant

Post by Inspector »

Deodorized kerosene has the stink removed and it is used for oil lamps etc. If you have one of the candle making supply craft places nearby they will likely sell it. You can also use her favourite scented lamp oil if you don't want SWMBO to gripe about the stink. A gallon of deodorized on Amazon costs a little less than a gallon of WD-40.
https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B07DD1Y7BF/ref ... NrPXRydWU=

Pete
pete
Posts: 2518
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:04 am

Re: Coolant

Post by pete »

I don't know for sure about the cheaper one's Ron, but some of the brand name (expensive) systems mentioned in that PM link I posted just might use some fancy pants flow technology to reduce that excess air misting. If you find yours doesn't do so, maybe ordering a replacement tip they use would be the cheapest way to test if they work a lot better. The air and coolant all seemed to be controlled by simple needle valves, so any mixing and mist reduction tricks would theoretically be in those tips. Fwiw, some have mentioned on YT that if you can see the coolant at all in the air stream as it exits the tip your using too much.

Good information I hadn't known about kerosene before Pete, and that it's even available stink free. :-) Thanks for that. For some jobs like tapping, counter boring for cap screws, reaming etc in aluminum. I think that Relton aluminum specific cutting fluid I mentioned before still works better than WD. Much harder to get of course. There's a noticeable reduction in torque between the two when hand tapping and I think better surface finish. For the same volume amounts, WD is still cheaper by the gallon though. What I don't know is if that Relton product might somehow effect secondary operations like anodizing or what solvent to use to remove it well enough so it doesn't.
Mr Ron
Posts: 2126
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Vancleave, Mississippi

Re: Coolant

Post by Mr Ron »

pete wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 10:52 pm I don't know for sure about the cheaper one's Ron, but some of the brand name (expensive) systems mentioned in that PM link I posted just might use some fancy pants flow technology to reduce that excess air misting. If you find yours doesn't do so, maybe ordering a replacement tip they use would be the cheapest way to test if they work a lot better. The air and coolant all seemed to be controlled by simple needle valves, so any mixing and mist reduction tricks would theoretically be in those tips. Fwiw, some have mentioned on YT that if you can see the coolant at all in the air stream as it exits the tip your using too much.

Good information I hadn't known about kerosene before Pete, and that it's even available stink free. :-) Thanks for that. For some jobs like tapping, counter boring for cap screws, reaming etc in aluminum. I think that Relton aluminum specific cutting fluid I mentioned before still works better than WD. Much harder to get of course. There's a noticeable reduction in torque between the two when hand tapping and I think better surface finish. For the same volume amounts, WD is still cheaper by the gallon though. What I don't know is if that Relton product might somehow effect secondary operations like anodizing or what solvent to use to remove it well enough so it doesn't.
Can I use Relton in a mist coolant system?
Mr.Ron from South Mississippi
User avatar
Bill Shields
Posts: 10558
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
Location: 39.367, -75.765
Contact:

Re: Coolant

Post by Bill Shields »

the relton (as described) that I used is too thick to put through a mister
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
pete
Posts: 2518
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:04 am

Re: Coolant

Post by pete »

Yep the viscosity right out of the can is as Bill said too thick. If you were to dilute it I'm unsure of what you'd use or how it would affect it's properties. My best guess is it was formulated and meant to only be applied with a brush, oil can etc. and probably thickened on purpose so it clings to the part surface or cutting tool. I don't do much in aluminum, so my can is now over 10 yrs old and whatever they were using when I bought it. With the way things get suddenly removed for safety and environmental reasons, I can't say for sure it's still the same today. So far I've seen no posts mentioning that it's been changed and now doesn't work as well. But if you buy a new can Ron I'd be interested in if it still works as well as mine does.
ChipMaker4130
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:00 am
Location: Ivins, Utah

Re: Coolant

Post by ChipMaker4130 »

A good 'mister' can be adjusted to a coarse, low-velocity sputter. I disagree with Mr. Evans, because a properly set-up mist/sputter can remove a great deal of heat, to the point of keeping the tool and the workpiece cool to the touch. When I use my Noga in this manner there is almost no fogging, the air stays safe. I use Rustlik WS-5050 which seems a bit expensive but it goes a very long way.
Inspector
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:25 am
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Re: Coolant

Post by Inspector »

Without a particle counter how do you know the air is safe? Particles under 10 micron are not visible and go deepest into your lungs. There are lots of under $50 particle counters available that would confirm it.

Pete
Post Reply